Gear Reviews > Tires > 2011 Panaracer CG XC; CG SC AM; CG AC AM; CG 4X AM

2011 Panaracer CG XC; CG SC AM; CG AC AM; CG 4X AM

Jun 7, 2012

Featured, Gear Reviews, Recommended, Tires

CG 4X / AM 2.35, 26″ (850g, 2.3″ actual width)

This is a rather strange tire design and has the narrowest performance band. It is designed specifically to roll fast on hardpack, and do little else.

Panaracer CG 4X AM

While the 4X / AM tire pedals and brakes very well on hardpack and rolls very quickly, it skates and floats high in gravel; sand; and loose, decomposed granite, and I found some of the braking edges to work against themselves. Hard braking in gravely and loose terrain forced the tire to skid and push in the wrong direction. However, the tire does transition and corner well in grass, which does make it a nice dual slalom tire.

The performance band of this tire is very narrow, but it handles its specific task very well. It makes a great 4x tire on packed and smoother surfaces, or in dusty, blown-out corners. It is a very good dirt jump tire if you like a little bigger volume casing (though it does not roll nearly as well as a Kenda Small Block 8, or Intense Micro-Knobby). It is also a great dual slalom race tire in grass and blown out berms.

The tire would perform nicely on rides such as Slickrock, in Moab; however, outside of these rather specific terrain types and conditions, the tire gives up significant performance to most traditional tires, and I would suggest looking elsewhere.

Conclusion:

The Panaracer Combo rubber compound works as advertised. It combines a quick-rolling and long-lasting outer rubber with a softer inner rubber to slow knob rebound and increase the tire’s ability to deform to match the terrain. This tread compound simply makes sense. It combines the best riding attributes of fast wearing, slow rolling, and grippy rubber, with the best attributes of a fast-rolling, rigid tire that conforms to the terrain poorly. And the best part of all is that Panaracer has been able to offer this technology in a ~$50 retail tire, rather than around $80, like the rest of its competition (Maxxis, Continental, Schwalbe).

The casing has proven to be very durable and has not offered any issue after significant testing. It should not, however, be thought of as “tubeless ready.” While it will hold air with sealant, the sidewall is thin and durability could be an issue.

Each CG tire meets its design goals, and most of them (the XC, SC, and AC) not only meet their goals, they approach nearly universal awesomeness. The one caveat is that the CG 4x / AM tire tread, while great for its intended purpose, is lacking everywhere else. Given its narrow performance range, other tires may make more sense.

I would not hesitate to recommend these tires to any trail rider, and really feel they deserve a good long look.

< Previous Page

1 2 3 4 5

Comments:

Reply

Paolo said:

July 11, 2012 at 2:24 am

I use th CG AC in front, and I have to say I am loving it!
Reply

Large Prof said:

September 3, 2012 at 12:06 am

Can you compare to the Hans Dampf in 29″? Looking to make a switch from my 2.4 Ardent in front, as the release of traction is quite unpredicable when it goes.
Reply

marshal said:

September 4, 2012 at 9:37 am

the hans dampf is much more square than the CG XC. the hans damf is very similar to a nevegal. The CG XC is more like a much more aggressive Maxxis Crossmark.

hope that helps?
Reply

Yoshi said:

September 27, 2012 at 9:18 am

Do you know the weight of the UST version of the AC AM 2.35? Panaracer havent published a weight on their site. Claimed weight for non-UST is 750gm.
Reply

marshal said:

October 1, 2012 at 10:30 am

hi yoshi,

I know the claimed CG AC weight was 750 and came in right on target. The UST tire is 800g claimed, but i have not seen a pair personally to verify.

thanks!