The most honest and in-depth reviews of outdoor sports equipment on the planet.

2016-2017 Salomon QST 106

Paul Forward reviews the Salomon QST 106 for Blister Gear Review.

Salomon QST 106

2016-2017 Salomon QST 106

Available Lengths (cm): 167, 174, 181, 188 cm

Actual Length (straight tape pull): 187.0 cm

Stated Weight per Ski (181 cm): 1900 grams

Blister’s Measured Weight per Ski (188 cm): 1957 & 1958 grams

Stated Dimensions (mm): 142-106-127

Blister’s Measured Dimensions (mm): 141-105-125.5

Stated Sidecut Radius: 20.0 meters

Core: Flax / Carbon Spaceframe Wood Core

Tip & Tail Splay (ski decambered): 62 mm / 23 mm

Traditional Camber Underfoot: ~4 mm

Recommended Mount Point: -7.8 cm from center; 85.7 cm from tail

Boots: Nordica GPX 130, Tecnica Zero G Pro Guide, Lange XT 130, Salomon MTN Lab, Salomon X Max 130 (all size 27.5)

Bindings: Salomon Warden on the Recommended line

Test Locations: Sun Valley, ID; Alyeska Resort, Girdwood, AK

Days skied: 14

Intro

To get started, you should check out Jonathan Ellsworth’s First Look at the QST 106. He outlines the whole QST line, and the place of the QST 106 within that line. He also points out that, while the QST 106 is marketed as “bi-directional” the shape and mount point suggest that the 106 is actually a more directional ski. Based on shape and flex, he also predicted that the QST 106 would do well in softer snow. He went so far as to speculate that, “in deeper snow, I anticipate that the QST 106 will float and plane as well as some skis in the 112-115mm width range.”

Paul Forward reviews the Salomon QST 106 for Blister Gear Review.

Paul Forward on the Salomon QST 106.

After several weeks of skiing the QST 106 regularly in Sun Valley, Idaho and at Alyeska Resort in Girdwood, AK, I generally agree with Jonathan’s predictions. Over the past few months, I’ve also been on a few other skis of a similar width and weight, and will mention them when applicable. (Most recently, I’ve been skiing the QST 106 back to back with the Volkl 100Eight and the DPS Wailer 106 Foundation.)

General Ride Characteristics

Overall, the QST 106 strikes a nice balance between feeling light and poppy while still providing some dampness to smooth out the bumps. Its relatively low swing weight, early taper, and rocker profile make turn initiation easy at low to moderate speeds, and should help make the ski feel accessible to less experienced skiers. The moderately stiff flex and rebound will reward stronger skiers at higher speeds with clean turns on firm snow, and the powder performance of the QST 106 is just plain excellent for a ski of this width. Those who want a little easier going ride might consider mounting 1 cm forward to help loosen up the tails, or possibly opt for the shorter length if you’re on the fence.

Groomers

I’ve had quite a few days this winter to make groomer runs on the QST 106, and overall, they’ve performed well. Alyeska has some great top to bottom groomer runs with a few places that allow for high speeds. When the snow is fairly soft, the QST 106 is capable of laying down some deep trenches. The relatively stiff tails and underfoot camber give nice rebound for snappy turn transitions. While I was in Sun Valley earlier this month, I got a chance to ski some of the best groomers of my life, and most of the time I was on the QST 106. When letting them run at high speeds, especially a bit later in the day when the groomers were firm and a little rougher, The QST 106 did exhibit a lot of tip flap. I never felt like it was unnerving or compromising the stability of the ski, but it was audible, visible, and palpable. I should also note that the tip shape (relatively pronounced early taper) and the relatively elongated tip rise make tip initiation feel more vague that a ski with a more traditional tip shape (ie, a ski with the widest point closer to the tip and a more abrupt rise in the tip at the end of the ski).

When skiing back to back with the 189 cm Volkl 100Eight, the QST 106 was less stable on edge, less precise in turn initiation and, to me, the 100Eight felt more intuitive while driving hard at high speeds. The 100Eight also felt better once the groomers were a bit roughed up later in the day. I attribute this to the longer effective edge of the 100Eight due to its more traditional shape and the long, low continuous rocker. When comparing the QST 106 to the DPS Wailer 106, the QST felt significantly more powerful with significantly better edge hold and rebound and a slightly damper ride. It’s been a little while since I’ve been on the Blizzard Cochise, but I’ve skied the Zero G 108 recently, and my impression is that the QST 106 initiates and holds a hard carve better than either of those Blizzard skis.

Deep Chop

Alyeska’s winter is really shaping up with quite a bit of powder skiing over the past few weeks. My favorite lift served skiing in North America is Alyeska’s North Face and a portion of it has been open this month. By mid-day the upper sections have been pretty cut up with a firm base and lots of soft deep chop and some pockets of soft pow. In these conditions the QST offers a fun ride that straddles the line between feeling light and poppy but still damp and stiff enough to cut through the chop when necessary. It doesn’t have the stability of the Cochise (still one of my favorite skis for these conditions) but the QST does hold an edge better and is a little easier to pop or drift a turn. When I swapped out to the 100Eight, I noticed again that the longer effective edge of the Volkl created a more stable ride but was a little tougher to slash around the in soft spots.

NEXT: Variable, Firm Conditions, Moguls, Etc

13 Comments

  1. Fredrik January 30, 2017 Reply

    Excellent review – sounds like a perfect ski for me. Thank you.

    How does it compare to the Black Crows Atris? (similar progressive stiffness I suspect?)

    • Brian Lindahl February 7, 2017 Reply

      Hi Fredrik,

      I don’t believe Paul has skied the Atris. I’ve only briefly skied the Atris and QST 106, and it was last season. However, I felt like they were different enough that I could offer some insight. I’ve also spent some recent time on the QST 99. The Atris felt like it skied short, and I don’t recall feeling this way about the QST 106 (or the QST 99). I also remember the Atris being very poppy or lively, whereas I don’t recall the QST 106 having this character (same with the QST 99). It’s more of a subdued carver.

  2. Blister Member
    Jim February 1, 2017 Reply

    Let’s hear more about the 100eight ! Looking at that for a 50/50 ski in the PNW, cheers

    • Author
      Paul Forward February 1, 2017 Reply

      it’s a good ski Jim. Working on the review now.

  3. Mik February 3, 2017 Reply

    How would you compare this ski to Line Sick Day 102? Both seem to be made for the same type of use and for same type of user. They both have low swing weight, and can be used anywhere in the mountain.

    Thanks

  4. Andy February 3, 2017 Reply

    Paul, sounds like you skied the new Nordica Enforcer 110. Tell me more! Thanks.

  5. ian February 12, 2017 Reply

    hi,
    I’m coming from a rocker 108, do they ski similar to them? I’ve throughly enjoyed the rockers to the point where they are now beat up and need replacing.
    thanks in advance

    • Yaroslav February 17, 2017 Reply

      yea, also really interested of this comparison ..and maybe Q-155.. it quite close

  6. Rich February 27, 2017 Reply

    I am looking at replacing my Q-Labs with the QST 106. Worried that the QST might be a bit weaker than the Labs. Any thoughts?

  7. Kristopher Silitonga March 12, 2017 Reply

    Any initial thoughts comparing to the Line Supernatural 108? Very excited about this review, great job!

  8. Blister Member
    mark March 13, 2017 Reply

    I have the Kingpins on this ski and love this setup for resort and day touring missions. Ive skied some deep days and yes, Paul is right in saying its not a 120mm+ ski but dam did it ski well on the deep days the West Coast has seen this season :)

  9. Dave Heinbach September 22, 2017 Reply

    Hi Paul,

    How did you like the ski with one of your lighter boot options? I’m using a TLT6 and they don’t quite have enough oomph for my Carbon Megawatts. Looking to get something smaller that’s a little more all-condition but that also lets me run the TLT6. Touring only.

    Thanks,
    Dave

  10. Bryce November 20, 2017 Reply

    Paul,

    I just purchased this ski to function as my touring ski (w/ MTN Lab boots & Fritschi Tecton’s). I had a question about the mount point. I come form a decidedly “new school” skiing background, and typically ski with a more center balanced stance. Do you think mounting these +1 cm from recommended would provide a surfier feel (with easy tail disengagement)? The other reason I’m considering a +1 mount is to provide a more balanced swing weight since I’m one of those people that likes to spin 3’s off everything I can. If this is going to have a drastic negative impact on the way the ski generally performs, I’ll just stick to the recommended line.

    Bryce

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*