2017-2018 Sego Big Horn 106

Cy Whitling reviews the Sego Big Horn 106 for Blister Gear Review

Sego Big Horn 106

Ski: 2017-2018 Sego Big Horn 106, 187 cm

Available Lengths: 169, 176, 181, 187 cm

Blister’s Measured Tip-to-Tail Length: 185.4 cm

Blister’s Measured Weight per Ski: 2080 & 2089 grams

Stated Dimensions: 136-106-130 mm

Blister’s Measured Dimensions: 136.5-107-131 mm

Stated Sidecut Radius: 19.5 m @ 181 cm

Tip & Tail Splay (ski decambered): 65 mm / 68 mm

Traditional Camber Underfoot: ~3-4 mm

Core: Poplar

Factory Recommended Mount Point: -3.8 cm from center; 88.9 cm from tail

Blister’s Recommended Mount Point: (tbd)

Boots / Bindings: K2 Pinnacle 130 / Marker Jester Demo

Days Skied: 7

Test Location: Grand Targhee, WY


Sego is an independent manufacturer that makes all their skis in Victor Idaho. You’ve probably seen the likes of Lynsey Dyer on their women’s skis, and while they do have an impressive women’s line, especially for an indy brand, they also have a full line of men’s skis.

For the 15/16 season, Sego introduced the Big Horn as a playful “50/50” ski. Its carbon layup, low weight, mount point, and playful shape and rocker profile combined to target jibby skiers looking for something to tour on.

The Big Horn 106 returns for 17/18 with the same dimensions, rocker profile, and topsheet, but Sego is going with a fiberglass layup instead of carbon. According to Sego, this made the ski much more versatile and stable while gaining only a little weight.

Cy Whitling reviews the Sego Big Horn 106 for Blister Gear Review

Cy Whitling on the Sego Big Horn 106, Grand Targhee, WY. (photo by: Julia Tellman)

Sego also introduced the new, narrower Big Horn 96 this year, and so has renamed the original Big Horn as the Big Horn 106.

So the new Big Horn 106 is supposed to be more resort-oriented, and it now competes directly with skis like the ON3P Kartel 108, Armada ARV 106, and K2 Marksman.


I’d sum up the Big Horn 106’s Flex Pattern like this:

Tips: 4-5

Underfoot: 8-9

Tails: 5-6

The Big Horn 106 is a little softer throughout than the Armada ARV 106, and the tips and tails stiffen up very quickly as they get closer to the center of the ski. It’s not quite a hinge-y flex, but it does ramp up very quickly from a soft section in the tips and tails to the stiffer midsection.


At just under 2100 grams per ski, the Big Horn 106 falls on the lighter end of the spectrum for ~106-108mm-underfoot all-mountain jib skis. It’s just a hair lighter than the K2 Marksman and Armada ARV 106, and over 100 g lighter than the ON3P Kartel 108.

~2100 g does seem to be a sweet spot for this sort of ski — light enough to be quick and easy to spin, but heavy enough to deal with the sort of variable snow that a ski this wide should typically be able to handle.

Shape and Profile

The Big Horn 106 does have a fair amount of tip taper; more than the ARV 106 or Kartel 108, but less than the dramatically tapered K2 Marksman.

It also has a fair amount of rocker, more splay and a deeper rocker line than the ARV 106, so it should plane well and be easy to maneuver in softer snow. Overall, though, there’s nothing too outlandish about the Big Horn in either shape, flex, or profile, which is a good thing, since we’ve really liked a lot of skis that look, (on paper at least) very similar to the Big Horn 106.

Mount Point

I measured the Big Horn 106’s recommended mount point at -3.8 cm from center. That’s a touch more centered than some of the other skis in this class, but it is pretty similar to the recommended -4 to -5 cm that many skis in this class have. I’ll experiment with the Big Horn mounted at recommended, but will also try the ski mounted a few centimeters back.

Initial Performance Impressions

I was able to take the Big Horn 106 out for a few laps last week. Targhee was in the middle of yet another storm cycle, and there were a few inches of fresh but slightly heavy snow on top of a firmer layer. And in this snow, the Big Horn 106 was a blast.

The skis did get bucked around in the more chopped-up sections, which wasn’t surprising given the high moisture content of the snow. But in fresh snow they planed well and were easy to throw around and slash. I hit a few jumps and drops on the Big Horn 106 and found the ski to be very stable on landings — they felt less prone to washing out than the Marksman I’d been skiing recently.

Bottom Line (For Now)

The Sego Big Horn 106 has all the makings of a versatile, playful all-mountain ski. We’ll be spending a lot more time on the Big Horn 106 in the coming weeks in a variety of snow conditions, and comparing it to the current crop of all-mountain freestyle skis. So stay tuned for the full review.

NEXT: Full Review


  1. Guy Anderson March 26, 2017 Reply

    Great review. They had a Sego demo day at our local hill this weekend up at Snoqualmie Pass. I did not try that ski but tried several others like the Cleaver which was awesome. And the 120 waist semi-swallow tail Prospect in a 187, my wife skied 2 ladies skis same shape with unicorn on the tip one was a low-fat layup 92 waist RCR ski and loved them super playful and accessible….I think it’s called Up To is the name in a 174, then skied its big sister in a 110 waist with full lay up….Lindsey Dyer ski – super stout RCR ……

    The 110 Sego women’s ski and the 120 waist men’s ski will be joining their relatives in the garage.

    Sego makes some good skis….not too far away in Victor Idaho.

    We are so excited ….Heidi may get the 92 & 110…..I’m all in with the 120

  2. Luke June 5, 2017 Reply

    Skied these at a demo day in Big Sky this winter. Even as a decidedly directional skier these felt super intuitive and easy to adjust to. Loved the pop and stability on landings. Highly considering these for next year.

    • Blister Member
      GuyAnderson May 10, 2018 Reply

      How did they do in variable??? Any tip flop



  3. Mike Hughes January 26, 2018 Reply

    Hi there! How would you rate these against the Nomad 105 (normal)? I ski Chamonix, so a lot of crud when it’s not good. But want a poppy ski. When it’s good I ride the Nomad 125 – it’s awesome!

  4. Blister Member
    stevenmulcahy123 April 23, 2018 Reply

    What happened to the deep dive comparison review Blister?

  5. mariobermudez00 August 30, 2018 Reply

    Hey Cy, I’m very confused with regards to pick the Sego Big Horn 106 or the K2 Marksman as my one ski quiver. I mostly do bumps, trees, advanced off trail terrain (inbounds though), and love to jump off of eveyrwhere in the mountain.

    Given that profile, which would you go with? I think I might be leaning to the Marksman.


  6. jason October 10, 2018 Reply

    Hey Cy,

    Great review! I actually picked these up as my go to BC skis because of this article. I was wondering if you ever mounted the skis back a few cm? I am going to put D fits on these and the recommended mount point just seems
    to far forward. Was looking at going 2-3cm further back? Just curious to see if you tried that.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *