2018-2019 Atomic Bent Chetler 100

(Click on images to expand)

Cy Whitling reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 for Blister

Atomic Bent Chetler 100



Cy Whitling reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 for Blister

Atomic Bent Chetler 100



Cy Whitling reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 for Blister

Atomic Bent Chetler 100 — Tip Profile



Cy Whitling reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 for Blister

Atomic Bent Chetler 100 — Tail Profile



Cy Whitling reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 for Blister

Atomic Bent Chetler 100



Cy Whitling reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 for Blister

Atomic Bent Chetler 100 — Bases


  1. Steffani Rideau March 22, 2018 Reply

    Maybe a Bent Chetler, PB & J battle.

  2. Blister Member
    taylor margot March 22, 2018 Reply

    Good list of skis to compare. Maybe throw the black crows freebird navis in there? I think a lot of are curious about the 50/50 capabilities of the Bent 100 / Rustler 10 / 190 Raven / 186 Sick Day / Navis Freebird, especially with the Shift on the horizon. The Backland 102 is gone, but maybe the new backland 107? kinda wide

    The Rustler 10, Liberty Origin, QST, etc getting to be a little heavy for an apples to apples weight comparison (theyre all bumping up against or over 2000grams i think) which opens the door to tons of other skis. The others you listed are all in the 100-105 width, soft tips with firmer backbone ski category, directional but tip and tail rockered, 1900 or less grams, and with the exception of the Raven, have camber.

  3. Blister Member
    Bredey March 22, 2018 Reply

    CT 2.0

  4. Blister Member
    EastSider March 23, 2018 Reply

    How about a comparison of this ski with the Nordica Enforcer 100?

  5. krys March 31, 2018 Reply

    can we do touring with the BC 100? any advice?

    • Luke Koppa Author
      Luke Koppa April 2, 2018 Reply

      Hi Krys,

      I’d say the Bent Chetler 100 is in the acceptable weight range for touring or 50/50 use, so we’ll be addressing this in our full review.



    • Matus September 14, 2018 Reply

      krys, I do tour with Atomic Backland 102 (1950g/ski) with no problem. I use it in combination with Atomic Tour tech binding and Scarpa F1 (weird but true). And yes, this combo proved to work great (tested in Europe and Japan).

  6. zeljo92 April 10, 2018 Reply

    When will be posted full review of Bent Chetler 100?


    • Blister Member
      taylor margot April 10, 2018 Reply


    • Luke Koppa Author
      Luke Koppa April 11, 2018 Reply

      We’re spending more time on the Bent Chetler 100 over the coming weeks in order to get it in more conditions and A/B it against some other skis, so I’d expect the full review to be dropped in a month, maybe two months at the latest.

  7. Blister Member
    Conor April 11, 2018 Reply

    I’m wondering how the Bent Chetler 100 might compare to the ON3P Kartel 96. I assume the Kartel will have more tail rocker, but in regards to stiffness they might be in the same park. Since Atomic is putting such a wide range for mount points, it seems that depending on where you mount, you could set it up as a ski you can pivot and have it feel as though there is more tail rocker than what is actually there.

  8. Sev July 12, 2018 Reply

    Why are you getting so hung up on the ski’s name? It’s basically an evolution of the Access ;) Atomic probably just rebranded it to profit off of the Bent Chetler name…

  9. Blister Member
    Jeff July 12, 2018 Reply

    How would you compare the 100 Bent Chetler to the Salomon Mtn Explore 95 for couloir skiing? I am not overly concerned with the weight penalty of the Cheater on the way up.


    • Luke Koppa Author
      Luke Koppa July 15, 2018 Reply

      Hi Jeff,

      That’s an interesting question. While I wouldn’t typically think of comparing the MTN Explroe 95 and Bent Chetler 100, I think I’d like both of them for couloirs. I think I’d take the Bent Chetler 100 in rougher, deeper, or more inconsistent snow since its extra weight, wider waist, and deeper tip rocker helps it stay a bit more composed in those conditions. But if things were really icy, I’d take the MTN Explore 95. I’d also take the MTN Explore 95 in *really* tight couloirs just since it’s a bit easier to flick around due to its lower weight (and it’s important to note that I’m comparing the 184 cm MTN Explore 95 to the 188 cm Bent Chetler 100).

      And if I were using the ski for couloirs in addition to skiing in the resort, or skiing a mix of pow, trees, hitting cliffs, etc., I’d take the Bent Chetler 100 for its better stability.

      Hope that helps, and let me know about any other questions.



      • Blister Member
        Jeff July 16, 2018 Reply


        Yes super helpful. Thanks for all the information you and the rest of Blister puts out there for us.


  10. Zarik July 12, 2018 Reply

    They seem like a great daily driver ski for me in Japan. Any feedback on how well they behave in powder? Shape and flex suggests they would punch above their width, but any direct experience? Same question for bumps

    Length wise for resort and side country use, I am 178cm around 83kg. Upper intermediate pretty aggressive 180 or 188 length? I preordered 188 but can change

    • Matus July 17, 2018 Reply

      188 is the way to go.

  11. Fabhz83 July 13, 2018 Reply

    Interesting review!! I know they’re widely different in construction, but how would you compare it to the Sakana? They are the two skis I’m looking at for next season for a 50/50 ski.

  12. Kyle July 13, 2018 Reply

    Volkl 90eight is the only way to go IMO it’s a better ski!! Plus you can tour in it hit the steeps jack of all trades. Bigger tips play for powder and more power overall. Surfy but stable and a great tour and steep ski.

  13. Matus July 17, 2018 Reply

    What about comparison with Atomic Backland 102?

  14. Jack September 3, 2018 Reply

    I had a chance to ski on the Rustler 10 188cm and the Bentchetler 100 188cm (and the Rustler 10 180cm, more on that shortly) back-to-back on a moderately wind-affected powder day (read: highly variable conditions) at Treblecone yesterday. Despite similar dimensions and flex profiles, these two skis reward very different approaches to skiing any type of snow/terrain. To summarize my experience, the Rustler 10 maintains an outstanding balance between maneuverability and edge hold, but sacrifices chop-ability to maintain its effortless turn initiation. Very engaging and very fun, but not so stable at high speeds. The Bentchetler 100 sacrifices this effortless turn initiation for impressive chop-ability and easily transitions from wind-blown powder stashes to wind-scoured crud, which can be quite scary on the Rustler 10.

    For a quiver of one, the Bentchetler 100 188cm is more versatile. But if conditions are good (fresh to tracked powder or soft groomers), the Rustler 10 180cm (yes, 180, not 188) a bigger smile on my face. The 180cm length in the Rustler 10 compliments its ease of turn initiation and versatility of turn radius. Bentchetler 100 188cm for blasting chop/crud and versatility, Rustler 10 180cm for energetic turns and all-day smiles in good snow. IMO the Rustler 10 188cm just doesn’t make sense next to the 180cm.

    I am going to buy one of these 2 pairs of skis this year (Rustler 180 or Bent 188) and will have a very diffucult time deciding.

    • Jack September 5, 2018 Reply

      Update: I skied on the Bentchetler 100 180cm today, an experience which had me questioning whether I’ll ever ski on anything else for the rest of my life. Ok, maybe that’s a little hyperbole but the Bentchetler 100 180cm strikes a divine balance between maneuverability, aggressive edge hold, and stability in crud. Nearly as maneuverable as the Rustler 10 180cm and much, much more stable. At no point throughout the day did I wish I was on a longer ski.

      For reference, over the past few years I have been skiing on the 2016/17 Navis Freebird 180cm, 2014/15 Blister Pro 188cm, 2012/13 Squad 7, and 2014/15 Black Diamond Carbon Convert, all skis which I have grown to love for their intended purposes. I have also spent a fair bit of time on the original Bentchetler (the one with tie-die bases and anime top-sheets), which I was never a fan of. While the Bentchetler 100 180cm may not be as light as the Convert or Navis, nor as stable as the Blister Pro, nor as floaty as the Squad 7, nor as “playful” as the OG Bentchetler, I am dumbstruck at how Atomic has achieved such a well-rounded balance of my favorite qualities from all of these skis with the Bentchetler 100 180cm. I would ideally mount these with robust AT binding such as the Kingpin 13 or Beast 14, and I’d be hard pressed to ski on anything else in any conditions, whether in-bounds or touring. If only they had a tail designed to be used with skins.. I’ll manage.

  15. veetow September 14, 2018 Reply

    Chris’ name is “Benchetler”. That said, these 100s sound super fun. Can’t wait to try them.

    • Luke Koppa Author
      Luke Koppa September 14, 2018 Reply

      Ah, thanks for the correction. Just updated.

  16. Blister Member
    tjaard September 21, 2018 Reply

    How did it do in moguls?

    • Luke Koppa Author
      Luke Koppa September 22, 2018 Reply

      Due to its weight and flex pattern, I’d say the BC 100 definitely falls on the more forgiving and easy end of the spectrum in terms of mogul performance. It’s so light that it’s very easy to flick around, but its pretty solid flex around the bindings provided plenty of support for me (5’8″, 155 lbs). In really nasty, firm, off-piste snow it got knocked around significantly more than more directional, heavier skis. But if you want a ski that’s light, still fairly strong, but that will forgive mistakes, the BC 100 could be a good fit. It’s not very loose, so if you want a ski to pivot and slide through bumps, the Line Sick Day 104 might be a better choice. And if you really like to press hard into the shovels of your skis in bumps, you’ll probably find the BC 100 to be too soft.

      Hope that helps, and let me know if you have any more specific questions.

  17. Markus Kurtenbach September 23, 2018 Reply

    How does it compare to the Salomon QST99 or 106? The weight is pretty similar and they do work as 50/50 skis too. Just bought the qst99 but didn’t mount my salomon shift yet.

  18. Nolan Stevenson September 24, 2018 Reply

    How would you compare this ski to a Sir Francis Bacon shorty, looking to upgrade

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *