2018-2019 Atomic Bent Chetler 120

(Click on images to expand)

Sam Shaheen reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 120

Atomic Bent Chetler 120



Sam Shaheen reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 120

Atomic Bent Chetler 120 — Tip Profile



Sam Shaheen reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 120

Atomic Bent Chetler 120 — Tail Profile



Sam Shaheen reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 120

Atomic Bent Chetler 120



Sam Shaheen reviews the Atomic Bent Chetler 120

Atomic Bent Chetler 120 — Bases


  1. Piter January 30, 2018 Reply

    I am waiting impatiently for the new Bent Chetler 120

  2. Blister Member
    Tex February 2, 2018 Reply

    Can’t wait for this review!!!!! I’m off to japan today with a pair of 191cm k2 catamarans. I’m hoping you guys will get a chance to get on this length also as it would be awesome to hear your thoughts on the ski compared to the 184cm.

  3. Konstantin February 3, 2018 Reply

    Hi guys

    Thanks for preview!

    Will these very light skis fit for heavy skiers with weight over 190 lbs or these skiers need to use more heavy skis?

    Best regards,

  4. Piter February 5, 2018 Reply

    I think they will be great, I will gladly buy these skis now! 192 cm

  5. Markus February 8, 2018 Reply

    I would love to know how heavy the Bent Chetler 100 is! Does anybody know?

  6. Blister Member
    Ryan Shea February 16, 2018 Reply

    @Markus. I demoed the 100 today (180cm) and it was very light both physically and when skiing.

    Also skied the enforcer 100 (177cm) and kore 93 (180cm). The Chetler 100 felt similar in weight to the Kore 93, much lighter than the Enforcer 100. If i had to guess I would say ~1700 grams per ski. Though all 3 are very different skis, the Chetler 100 was the most stable out of the mix for me. Enforcer was nice ski too though. The Chetler also felt like it wanted to be in the air and would be super stable on landings. What was cool is that it carves remarkably well and i didnt see any signs of tip flap. Very fun ski overall.

    I have a few skis 105+ underwaist, so was looking for something ~100 underfoot. The Chetler seems to be a great option for me as a “do it all ski” aside from deep days. You can tell this ski would float very well too.

    Btw conditions were tough for the demo, heavy rain all day, some slush, alot of melting ice, but overall very hard ski surface in general. I felt most confident on the bent chetlers. Top speed was ~45

    • Blister Member
      Jantzen February 26, 2018 Reply

      Ryan, must have been the conditions. Or the marketing BS is not BS afterall…you felt a ~1600g ski was more stable than a ski, with metal, weighing a pound+ per foot more.

  7. Felix March 2, 2018 Reply

    How much does the 192 weight? And how does the 184 and 192 feel compared to the Magnum opus Swing weight wise, especially in the air for rotations and flips

  8. John March 22, 2018 Reply

    Hi guys, what do you think about touring uphill with the Bent Chetler 100? As far as I could read it’s just about 1550-1600gr, so must be fine for that too, right? Any characteristics that speak against it? Thanks!

  9. krys March 31, 2018 Reply

    same question as John on touring with the BC 100? any advice?

    • Luke Koppa
      Luke Koppa April 2, 2018 Reply

      Hi Krys,

      We have actually been spending a good deal of time touring on the Bent Chetler 120, so we’ll definitely be talking about that in our full review, which will be dropping in the next few weeks.



  10. Blister Member
    taylor margot May 9, 2018 Reply

    Chet vs. Bibby Tour?

  11. Blister Member
    MJones May 13, 2018 Reply

    Thoughts on the Bent Chetler 120 vs. the Line Pescado as a 50/50 pow ski to throw a pair of shifts on next season?

    Would be used for pow touring and occasional inbounds pow days in the PNW (i.e. high moisture-content snow). Also probably slushy spring days. Looking for something very surfy and fun in pow that also isn’t too awful for skiing shitty snow on the way back to the trailhead or chopped-up crud in the afternoon at the resort.

    5’8, 165 lbs, directional skier. Would likely mount the BC at -2cm or -3cm.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *