The most honest and in-depth reviews of outdoor sports equipment on the planet.

2nd Look: Marker Kingpin 13

Paul Forward reviews the Marker Kingpin 13 for Blister Gear Review.

Marker Kingpin 13

2015-2016 Marker Kingpin 13 (& Kingpin 10)

Maximum DIN release value: 13

Available Brake Widths: 75-100 mm; 100-125 mm

Climbing Aids: Flat, 7˚, and 13˚

Toe Stand Height: 21 mm

Stated Weight: 768 grams

Bister’s Measured Weight:

• Toe pieces: 199 & 200 grams (with screws)

• Heel pieces: 363 & 363 grams

• Heel platform with 75-100mm brakes (with screws): 212 grams

• Total Weight per Binding (with 75-100 mm brakes): 774 & 775 grams

MSRP: $649 USD (Kingpin 13); $599 USD (Kingpin 10)

Skis Used:
Blizzard Zero G 108, 185 cm
Volkl BMT 109, 186 cm
Moment Blister Pro, 184 cm
Line Sick Day Tourist, 186 cm

Boots Used:
Salomon MTN Lab, 26.5; Salomon MTN Explore, 26.5; Scarpa Freedom RS, 27.0; Fischer Trans Alp, 26.5

Test Locations: Canterbury, New Zealand, backcountry; Santa Fe & Taos, NM, backcountry

Days Tested: ~35

A few things:

(1) This is our 2nd review of the Marker Kingpin 13. Before reading my review, you should read our 1st review of the Kingpin, by Paul Forward, because I’m not going to rehash all the details Paul talks about.

(2) I’m not interested in trying to talk you out of whatever AT binding you like best or trust most, and I encourage you to use the one you feel most comfortable with.

(3) But—and spoiler alert here—this review is going to explain why the Kingpin is currently the only binding I want to tour in. It’s just not going to argue that you are dumb for using or preferring something else. The Kingpin is still a relatively new product, and I can appreciate why some people are reluctant to be early adopters of new AT equipment—I’m usually one of those people.

But, for now, I feel like the Kingpin is such a significant improvement over the other tech bindings I’ve used that I’m not looking back.

Paul Forward reviews the Marker Kingpin 13 for Blister Gear Review.

Jonathan Ellsworth in the Marker Kingpin 13, Mt Cheeseman backcountry.

Going Uphill

I really like touring in the Kingpin 13 & 10. I’ve used both a bunch with zero issues. I like the risers, I like the way the brakes get out of the way, and I like the weight of the setup. Note: if you are bummed out because you think the Kingpin is too heavy, then you probably shouldn’t care about my Kingpin review, because you and I likely are looking for pretty different things out of an AT binding. Because given how well this binding works (both uphill and downhill), I find the weight of the Kingpin to be a cause for celebration.

Paul Forward reviews the Marker Kingpin 13 for Blister Gear Review.

Jonathan Ellsworth in the Marker Kingpin 13, Mt Cheeseman backcountry.

I’ll also qualify my comments in this section to say that I don’t think I’ve hated going uphill on any tech binding. The G3 ION is probably the other AT binding that I’ve spent the most time on recently, and I think that binding goes uphill quite well, too. I still prefer the Kingpin to the ION for touring / going up, but for relatively minor reasons. Namely, I’ve found that stepping into the ION can be a bit more finicky than the Kingpin, but I wouldn’t say this is a huge deal.

NEXT: Going Downhill, Caveats, Etc.

12 Comments

  1. Maz January 25, 2016 Reply

    Hey Jonathan

    Could you see the Kingpin as an NZ club fields binding? It’s not exactly “resort” skiing, and there aren’t many bumps/moguls at Cgraigieburn, but as you know we get our fair share of variable conditions – begging to be skied fast!

    Cheers

    • Author

      (1) See all the caveats in my review. (2) It wouldn’t surprise me at all if some people were / are happily skiing the Kingpins at the club fields. But when those conditions are variable or worse, seems to me you’d be very wise to bump up the finesse and / or slow things down. Everyone has to answer this question for his or her self, but for me personally, I think it’s still too much fun to ski the clubbies hard and fast — big GS turns in variable / refrozen snow — and I think it’s just obviously better and safer in those cases to be on a good alpine binding. But to each his own…

  2. Stephan January 25, 2016 Reply

    You guys should seriously have a look at the Fritschi Vipec. Especially the new black version, which seems to have resolved the last of the issues they had as a new binding.

    I find the lateral release at the toes to be very reliable up to now, with no pre-release issues. I’ve skied it quite a bit inbounds and don’t feel much harshness either, which could be attributed to the elasticity it gains in the toes (like an alpine binding).

    I’m not saying that it will replace an alpine binding, but I chose it specifically because I thought it would be a better at pulling double duty than most tech bindings and is safer. Anyone with similar intentions (probably people who are looking at the Kingpin aswell) should give be giving it a look! There’s a good review on TGR from leelau (he skied last years version though).

  3. Maz January 26, 2016 Reply

    Thanks Jonathan,
    and yep, I hear you. I may just have to get a CAST setup for club field service. It is a very good feeling hearing that STH “clunk”, and it would be a shame to dial it back at CV.

  4. Andrey January 29, 2016 Reply

    cant wait for vipec black edition review, cant decide between the two :)

    i have one quiver setup with fritchi freeride pro and salomon sentinell, anyway 5.5kilo on every foot uphill :D:D looking for something lighter and see u like w-verks- katana a lot :)

    and about katanas using only marker binding… even some dynafit sells as markers (radical with changed name on some markets)

  5. Dan January 30, 2016 Reply

    Thanks for the update on this review. After some years on traditional tech bindings, I’m definitely keen on getting hold of a set of Kingpins or the Beast 14. In terms of price and weight they seem quite similar.

    I’m mostly interested in how they ski down in comparison – the toe elasticity in the Beast seems to be an advantage, whilst the heel piece of the Kingpin seems to offer considerable power transfer. Having skied both, do you guys have any preference either way in terms of downhill performance in BC/variable conditions?

  6. Peter Gallant February 11, 2016 Reply

    Interesting that you’ve had no pre-releases, the bane of tech bindings since inception. I once attended to a poor chap who had both Dynafits pop off his feet at a no fall zone, and over the cliff he went. Spent a week in the hospital. The Swiss heli-evac team was incredible. I suffered with pre-releasing Dynafits with 3 different boots over 5 years and finally threw in the towel. I bought a pair of Kingpins and some Salomon Quest Max 130 boots recently for a month long trip to the Alps, hoping that I would find nirvana. Well guess again. They popped off pretty easily on Din 8, so upped the Din to 10 [I weigh 170 pounds, and I’m too old to be anything but a finesse skier]. Side stepping down some steep exposed rock, both popped off as if the Din were set to 2 [ski mode]. Over the cliff I went for a fun slide down the hill. So if you’re putting yourself over some exposure, be forewarned, these are a light touring binding, as all tech bindings are. If you plan on taking risks with your skiing [you know…skiing], I would advise looking elsewhere. Oh, I have a good deal on some boots and bindings if anyone is interested.

  7. Jay February 16, 2016 Reply

    On my third pair this year, the pins are still backing out! Easy to tell when it starts happening, the toes get more an more difficult to release, when the pin gets far enough out you can see where the pin begins to narrow again. My third pair are already moving, a few more days and I can tell I will be on my fourth set this year! Too bad, otherwise this binding is the Panacea we have all been waiting for, cliffs, ice, switch, fast, never prereleasing, no failures except this one ridiculous issue that still haven’t figured out! If the pin simply widened on the outside as well (which I’m sure they will figure out) then it will be all-time. I never lock the toes out, and aside from the mentioned added jarringness (and that i will soon be on my fourth pair), they are perfectly capable at the resort.

    • Jay February 16, 2016 Reply

      I should have mentioned… I ski my Dukes at 10, but the Kingpins have to be at 13, or the heel releases on big deep snow landings. Kind of funny but it’s actually heel elasticity that I miss the most.

  8. kevin low December 4, 2016 Reply

    hi jonathan, might you know if there would be any mounting hole overlap issues between the marker grifon and kingpin bindings? thanks much : ) kevin

  9. Mark Schaffer June 8, 2017 Reply

    Skied these for 4 months. Toe pin sheared off while in tour mode. Marker customer service is not responding. Skis well enough but suffers from  shoddy manufacturing, also has a problem with snow compacting in the heel piece. A nuisance, which is perhaps worth dealing with, until the toe pin sheers and you need another pair of $600 bindings because Marker won’t honor their warranty. Will be looking for other options next.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*