3 comments on “2019-2020 Faction Prodigy 3.0”

  1. Hi, very nice review. I will try to demo the Prodigy this winter. One question: I noted that you do mention other skis in comparison (in this Review and others) like the SD 104, Rustler 10, Ranger 102 etc. However, no mention of the Soul 7. Any reason for that? Is the Soul 7 Not as good or interesting?

    Thanks and keep up the good work!

  2. Hi Luke,
    Nice review. Could you please answer following question? I tried CT 2.0 in park – and really like swing weight, flex and rail performance. However on all mountain side it seems that I didn’t like its true twin shape in really soft snow, bumps and powder I felt like it was harder to ski than on skis with directional twin shape (I mean when tip is wider than heel). like heel constantly hooked on snow. I wonder how prodigy 3.0 with -2.5…-3 mount would compare to CT 2.0 or CT3.0 as 1 travel ski to learn stuff in park and ski all mountain. your flex indication shows that they are really stiff. With ct 2.0 butter become really easy. Also I’m 177 cm and 60 kg. Would it still be easy to butter these skis (prodigy 3.0) in 183?

Leave a Comment