MHM Fifty-Two 80

Design & Main Features

MHM is known for incorporating some innovative features in the designs of their packs (the Salute 34’s “Snake-Loader” S-shaped zipper and the PowderKeg 32’s versatile ski/snowboard carry system, for example). As the granddaddy of MHM’s line of backpacks, the Fifty-Two 80 has some of it’s own unique features that set it apart from from other high-volume packs.

Main Compartment Zippers

Two beefy zippers run down each side of the Fifty-Two 80. The zippers each have two sliders, which allows you to open up the pack in two ways; it can either be opened like a clamshell from the top, or opened from the bottom when the top is rolled shut. I found this zipper configuration especially useful in that allows for easy, quick access to things stored at the bottom of the pack (i.e., fragile items that have to be cushioned or papers/maps that can’t get wet). Generally speaking, these twin zippers also make it easier to pack the Fifty-Two 80 efficiently. It’s easy to open up a specific part of the pack and stuff an extra pair of socks or a raincoat in an empty space, even if you’ve already loaded items in above it.

Matt Zia reviews the MHM Fifty-Two 80, Blister Gear Review.
One of the Fifty-Two 80’s full-length side zippers

Roll Top / Zippered Shroud

Instead of using a double drawstring to close the top of the pack’s main compartment (like you’ll find on many other packs of this size), the Fifty-Two 80 has a roll-top closure similar to that found on a dry bag.

Matt Zia reviews the MHM Fifty-Two 80, Blister Gear Review.
Roll top closure on the MHM Fifty-Two 80

In my opinion, a double drawstring makes it a little easier to utilize every last bit of available volume at the top of a pack and is simpler to close. And though its shroud’s closure is similar to that of a dry bag, the Fifty-Two 80 is not technically waterproof. However, the the pack’s roll top doesn’t rely on a continuous loop of cord at the mouth of the closure (like a drawstring design). This makes it possible to incorporate the two zippers that run all the way up the sides of the pack which, as mentioned above, is great for storage and loading the Fifty-Two 80.

Brain and Front Pocket

Several well-placed external pockets also help make the Fifty-Two 80 very user friendly. The pack’s removable top lid or “brain”, which straps down above the shroud of the main compartment, has a single compartment with zippers on both the front and the back, allowing for easy access. There is a water-resistant pocket and a mesh pocket inside the brain’s pocket.

Matt Zia reviews the MHM Fifty-Two 80, Blister Gear Review.
Front “J-zip” pocket on the MHM Fifty-Two 80

The Fifty-Two 80 also sports a J-shaped zippered exterior pocket on the front of the pack. This pocket is accessible even when the main compartment of the pack is fully stuffed, and is the perfect size for stowing papers and books so that they won’t get folded or bent.

3 comments on “MHM Fifty-Two 80”

  1. Matt, compared to something like a Gregory Baltoro 75, how would you say the suspension compares for loads upwards of 50lbs? Lumbar support good?

    • Hey Jeff, I think the suspension on the Baltoro 75 is comparable to the Fifty-Two 80 as far as >50lbs loads go, but as far as carrying comfort goes I personally prefer the foam that MHM uses as it’s a bit more airy and I think dries faster than the foam that Gregory uses. I would also say that I have had few good experiences with the durability on Gregory packs; specifically I’ve seen multiple Gregory packs on which the stitching around the shoulder straps blew out. With that said of course, I typically put a lot of wear on packs, upwards of 60 field days a summer, and as such tend to accelerate the process.

  2. Very much appreciate the response. Like every review on Blister, yours on this pack is complete and no-nonsense. I’m in the market for a pack simpler than what I have and need it to carry heavy loads well, for miles at a time. I dig the small shop, innovation of companies like MHM and love the fact that sites like Blister are taking the time to look at them. For the amount of money it takes to get into a good pack, taking a chance on less well-established companies is a risk many are not willing to take. Anyway, enough being all wordy… you guys are awesome and your review and response to my question has made my decision. Thanks and keep up the great work.

Leave a Comment